The benefit and curse of being a "peacemaker" personality in the Ennegram chart is that I tend to see all sides of an argument. After posting a little while ago, I ran across this blog with an article by Chuck Baldwin entitled, "Can Two Walk Together without Agreement?" He makes some excellent points and I think the answer comes down to one question -- Will Sarah Palin hold to her values and constantly nip at McCain's heels like that pesky pit bull she's been since her basketball days or will she cave and become like the rest of Washington? And in the grand scheme of things, is it right to put Sarah's soul at risk to find out? Can "Mrs. Smith Go to Washington" and come out the other side with her integrity entact?
Can Two Walk Together Without Agreement?
by Chuck Baldwin
September 3, 2008
John McCain's selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as his Vice
Presidential running mate was exactly what he needed to do to make
himself competitive against Barack Obama in the November elections.
(For the record, I predicted three weeks ago that Palin would be his
choice.) As a result (and right on cue), conservatives throughout the
country--especially Christian conservatives--are now fully supporting
McCain's candidacy for President. Even James
"I-will-never-vote-for-John-McCain" Dobson has endorsed McCain.
By all appearances, Governor Palin is a true conservative. She is
pro-life. She is pro-Second Amendment. Alaska is one of only two states
(Vermont is the other) that recognize the right of their citizens to
carry handguns without a Concealed Carry Weapon (CCW) permit. She was
rightly critical of the invasion of Iraq, once calling it a "war for
oil." Speaking of oil, she believes we should drill for oil in Alaska
and throughout the U.S., and is critical of the federal government for
allowing America to become dependent upon foreign oil for our energy
needs. She even heaped praises upon the Republican that Republicans
love to hate: Ron Paul. Beyond that, Lynette Clark, the chairman of the
Alaskan Independence Party (the party under which yours truly is on the
Presidential ballot this year) reports that Sarah Palin was a member of
the party back in the early 90s. This is very encouraging in that the
AIP is a patriotic, states' rights party that holds strong sentiments
opposing the New World Order propensities of the two major parties. In
essence, Sarah Palin is everything that John McCain isn't. Which leads
to the question that was asked long ago by the Hebrew prophet: "Can two
walk together, except they be agreed?"
When the no-compromise
constitutionalist, Ron Paul, was asked by CNN's Wolf Blitzer if he
would consider being John McCain's running mate, he said no. His reason
for that was that should McCain do something fundamentally counter to
his constitutional convictions--such as bombing Iran without a
Declaration of War (or other possible unconstitutional actions that
Paul knows McCain is predisposed to)--he would have to resign. Knowing
this, he (Paul) could not in good conscience accept a McCain invitation
to join his ticket (not that McCain would ever ask him to be his
running mate; Ron was not even invited to participate in the Republican
convention, for Pete's sake).
Herein lies the problem for Sarah
Palin. How can a principled conservative support the policies and
actions of an unprincipled globalist such as John McCain? As Vice
President, Palin will be required to promote and defend McCain's
big-government, liberal, and globalist plans. For example, what will
she do when John McCain proposes amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens, which he is certain to do? What will she do when McCain
proposes to close gun shows, or at least the private sale of firearms
at gun shows? What will she do when he proposes to increase federal
spending for abortion providers (which he has done numerous times as
senator)? What will she do when he promotes federal spending for
embryonic stem cell research? What will she do when John McCain
proliferates Bush's police state machinations by expanding the Patriot
Act and similar legislation? What will Palin do when McCain decides to
nuke Iran (and who knows what else), not only without a Declaration of
War by Congress, but also without provocation or justification? What
will she do as John McCain expands the Security and Prosperity
Partnership with Canada and Mexico? What will she do as McCain opens
the door of the NAFTA superhighway and the North American Union? What
will she do as John McCain allows the United Nations to dictate and
manipulate America's foreign policy? Again, can two walk together
except they be agreed?
Let's face it: John McCain is using
Sarah Palin as inducement to trick conservatives into accepting his
liberal, big-government, globalist candidacy. And, sadly, it is working.
As I have said before, today's national Christian leaders are among the
most gullible people on the planet. They are so desperate to be invited
to sit at the king's table that they will compromise practically any
principle. But accepting John McCain was a not only a bitter pill, it
was a BIG pill, one they could not get down without a major dose of
syrup. And that is exactly what Governor Palin brings to the table:
sweet syrup to help conservatives swallow John McCain.
Unfortunately, the things that make Palin so attractive (her
conservative principles) are the things that she will be forced to
surrender in order to be John McCain's running mate. The best thing
that can happen to Sarah Palin is for John McCain to lose the November
election. This would allow her to go into the 2012 elections as perhaps
the Republican Presidential frontrunner. If McCain wins in November,
and Palin is forced to serve at the pleasure of this globalist insider
for four years, she will be forever ruined as a genuine constitutional
conservative. Remember, "No man can serve two masters." One cannot be
faithful to the Constitution and a constitutional apostate such as John
McCain at the same time. That is an absolute impossibility.
What our conservative friends need to wake up to is the depth of
duplicity and wickedness that permeates Washington politics (in both
major parties) today. There is nothing that these globalist insiders at
the Council on Foreign Relations (of which John McCain is a longtime
member) will not do to fulfill their power-mad plans. There is nothing
too evil, too sinister, or too iniquitous, including using, abusing,
chewing up and then spitting out good people such as Sarah Palin. Even
more unfortunate and sad is the fact that the James Dobsons of this
world are too blind to see it.
*If you enjoyed this column and
want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing
audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money
Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php
© Chuck Baldwin
This column is archived as http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2008/cbarchive_20080903.html
Recent Comments